Dragon Ball Daima launched in October 2024, marking the final direct involvement of Akira Toriyama in the franchise before his passing. As the last major project under his creative oversight, it carried inherent weight, yet divided opinions. Now, those critiques have shifted focus to Kazuhiko Torishima, the series’ inaugural editor and early collaborator, who branded it “anime garbage” in a YouTube transmission, bypassing the series itself to critique its legacy.
Toriyama’s Ex-Editor
During a YouTube stream, Torishima openly aired his frustration with recent saga developments, with Dragon Ball Daima as the primary target. He argued the work fell short of Toriyama’s standards, suggesting an end to Dragon Ball Super productions in favour of alternative projects. His remarks ignited social media discourse within hours, framing a debate about creative continuity and legacy.
Was Dragon Ball Daima a Bad Anime?
The controversy hinges on expectations. While Dragon Ball Daima lacked the narrative rupture or iconic villains of earlier arcs, it showcased meticulous technical execution. The reimagined Super Saiyan 4, for instance, was a visual highlight, yet its purpose was to revive elements of Dragon Ball GT, a move Toriyama explicitly endorsed. Critics who label it “garbage” may be overreaching, as the series fulfilled its role as a continuation of the Goku universe.
The Other Face of the Currency
From Toei Animation’s production standpoint, Dragon Ball Daima stood as one of the franchise’s most polished episodic series. Despite continuity debates with Dragon Ball Super and an ending that raised more questions than answers (such as the enigmatic “evil eyes”), its entertainment value and narrative nuance were undeniable. It succeeded in advancing the Goku legacy without overcommitting to a sprawling storyline.
A Trial That Divides the Fandom
Torishima’s critique has splintered the fanbase. Some argue that Dragon Ball should rest on its laurels, valuing Daima’s simplicity and clarity. Others align with Torishima, contending that the creative direction fails to sustain the franchise’s vitality. The debate now centres on whether his assessment reflects a genuine critique or a lack of respect for Toriyama’s final work and the team behind it.
And now the question remains in the air: do you think Torishima is right when calling Dragon Ball Daima “garbage,” or do you think his words are a lack of respect for the last work of Akira Toriyama and the entire animation team that made it possible? The debate is open.
Leave a Comment